Similar Projects
Last Updated | 08/29/2022 02:04 PM |
Project Title | RFQ - 133rd Airlift Wing, St. Paul MN - Architect and Engineering - SATOC |
Physical Address | View project details and contacts |
City, State (County) | Saint Paul, MN 55101 (Ramsey County) |
Category(s) | Professional Services |
Sub-Category(s) | Engineering |
Contracting Method | Competitive Bids |
Project Status | Construction start expected February 2023 |
Bids Due | View project details and contacts |
Estimated Value | $10,000,000 [brand] Estimate |
Plans Available from | Agency's Affiliate |
Owner | View project details and contacts |
Architect | View project details and contacts |
Description | INDEFINITE DELIVERY TYPE ARCHITECT ENGINEER (A-E) CONTRACT FOR THE MINNESOTA NATIONAL GUARD IN SUPPORT OF THE AIR NATIONAL GUARD, 133rd AIRLIFT WING, ST. PAUL MINNESOTA.\ CONTRACT INFORMATION: The Minnesota National Guard is soliciting for Non-Personal Architect-Engineer (A-E) Services per Public Law 92-582 (Selection of A-E Statute) and Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) Part 36. One contract will be solicited unrestricted for a five-year ordering period. The North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) code for this action 541330. The Small Business size standard is $16.5M. Small businesses are encouraged to team with other businesses. The A-E firm must be capable of responding to and working on multiple task orders concurrently. As a result of this announcement, the Minnesota National Guard intends to award one (1) Indefinite Delivery Indefinite Quantity IDIQ A-E contract award solicited as Other than Small Business (i.e. unrestricted). This contract will provide A-E services in support of the 133rd Airlift Wing, St. Paul, Minnesota Air National Guard (ANG). This is not a requirements contract. See attachment for complete details. 8.17.22: Amendment #01 added along with RFI Tracker *Visit 'https://piee.eb.mil/sol/xhtml/unauth/search/oppMgmtLink.xhtmlsolNo=W912LM22R0003' to obtain more details.* 8.17.22: Amendment #01 added along with RFI Tracker1 INDEFINITE DELIVERY TYPE ARCHITECT ENGINEER (A-E) CONTRACT FOR THE MINNESOTA NATIONAL GUARD IN SUPPORT OF THE AIR NATIONAL GUARD, 133rd AIRLIFT WING, ST. PAUL MINNESOTA. CONTRACT INFORMATION: The Minnesota National Guard is soliciting for NonPersonal Architect-Engineer (A-E) Services per Public Law 92-582 (Selection of A-E Statute) and Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) Part 36. One contract will be solicited unrestricted for a five-year ordering period. The North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) code for this action 541330. The Small Business size standard is $16.5M. Small businesses are encouraged to team with other businesses. The A-E firm must be capable of responding to and working on multiple task orders concurrently. As a result of this announcement, the Minnesota National Guard intends to award one (1) Indefinite Delivery Indefinite Quantity IDIQ A-E contract award solicited as Other than Small Business (i.e. unrestricted). This contract will provide A-E services in support of the 133rd Airlift Wing, St. Paul, Minnesota Air National Guard (ANG). This is not a requirements contract. The contract will consist of a five (5) year ordering period with a total contract ceiling of $10M for the entire program. The total contract period shall not exceed five (5) calendar years. The minimum total fee guaranteed to each contract awardee is $2,500.00. Order limitations are as follows: The Contractor is not obligated to honor (1) any order for a single item in excess of $5M or (2) any order for a combination of items in excess of $8M. Work will be issued by negotiated firm-fixed price task orders. Task orders will be primarily for projects with a construction value that typically result in an A-E task order less than $1M. Projects to be designed are not yet determined and funds (except those reserved for the minimum fee guarantee) are not presently available. Selection of A-E firms is based on professional qualifications necessary for the performance of the required services (rather than competitive bidding procedures). All A-E firms are cautioned to review the restrictions of FAR 9.5, Organizational and Consultant Conflicts of Interest, and FAR 36.209, Construction Contracts with Architect-Engineer Firms. Any A-E firm that prepares a Design-Build Request for Proposal for a particular project will be restricted from participating in any contract or task order for the Design-Build of that particular project. All interested Architect-Engineers are reminded that, in accordance with the provisions of PL 95- 507, they will be expected to place subcontracts to the maximum practicable extent consistent with the efficient performance of the contract with small and small disadvantaged firms. Small Business firms that are selected under the Small Business 2 set aside must perform 50 percent of the contract performance by the prime or a similarly situated Small Business subcontractor IAW FAR 52.219-14. Large business firms that intend to pursue an IDIQ contract must convey their intent to meet the minimum small business goals on the SF 330, Section C., by identifying subcontracting opportunities with small businesses. If selected as the most highly qualified firm, the large business offeror will be required to submit a Small Business Subcontracting Plan in accordance with FAR 52.219-9 and DFARS 219.704/705 as a part of the Request for Proposal Package. The subcontracting plan is NOT required with the SF 330 submittal. The minimum subcontracting goals are Minimum goals for this procurement are: Small Business (all types of small business combined) 30%; Small Disadvantaged Businesses 3%; Woman Owned Small Business 3%; HUBZone Small Business .5%; Veteran-Owned SB .5% and Service Disabled Veteran Owned SB .5%.The subcontracting plan will be based on subcontracting dollars. PROJECT INFORMATION: Anticipated A-E services for the 133rd Airlift Wing may include but are not limited to performance of planning, master planning, and program support; A-E investigative and design services including development of construction documents; construction support; engineering and environmental studies, National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) documentation; investigations and surveys in support of the Air National Guard Programs. Typical work may include, but is not specifically limited to: A: the preparation of plans, specifications, calculations, and cost estimates; B: the development of cost management, quality control and quality assurance plans; C: construction inspection, testing and management services; D: development of engineering standards; E: preparations for design submissions; F: technical, economic, planning, environmental, value engineering and other studies, analyses, surveys, investigations, and reports; G: development of performance criteria for bridging documents for design build projects; H: development of documents to support various government construction programs; I: commissioning services; J: comprehensive interior design. Services may also include, but are not limited to, a wide variety of professional services in support of projects for administrative, industrial, and support facilities to meet the needs of the Air National Guard. Various projects may include services associated with National Guard installations/facilities, such as aircraft hangars, Corrosion Control Facilities, aircraft maintenance facilities, Sensitive Compartmented Information Facilities (SCIF), vehicle maintenance facilities, support equipment maintenance facilities, administrative offices, supply facilities, civil engineering facilities, training site facilities, security forces facilities, communications and electronic maintenance, mobility and aerial port facilities, dining facilities, medical training facilities, roadways, military airfield 3 pavements, site utilities, infrastructure, and other support facilities. Additionally, task orders may be issued for support services which require A-E Services as defined in FAR 2.101. SELECTION CRITERIA - The selection criteria are listed below in descending order of importance (first by major criterion and then by each sub-criterion). Criteria A - Professional Qualifications necessary for satisfactory performance of required ser vices (SF330, Part I, Section E): The selected firm must have either inGhouse or through consultants, all disciplines listed for this criteria and must provide resumes in Part I, Section E, of the SF330. Resumes shall not exceed two (2) pages each. All engineers, architects and the project manager must have the following in the role they are assigned to on the project team: a Bachelor's degree, professional registration, and at least five (5) years of relevant experience. The Government may give additional consideration for special training or certifications, additional registration, higher level of education degrees, and/or years of experience that exceeds the five (5) year minimum requirement. (1) Mechanical Engineer; (2) Project Manager; (3) Architect; (4) Electrical Engineer; (5) Structural Engineer; (6) Civil Engineer; (7) Fire Protection Engineer - must have an ABET accredited engineering degree and current registration in the field of Fire Protection Engineering within the United States or its territories, having passed the National Council of Examiners for Engineering and Surveyors (NCEES), and at least five (5) years of relevant experience; (8) Communications Specialist Registered Communications Distribution Design (RCDD) (9) Environmental Engineer or Physical Scientist with experience in NEPA processes; registered engineer or similar registration that includes documented work history, state examination, and state certification board; (10) Surveyor who is a registered professional land surveyor with 5 years of relevant experience; (11) Cost Estimator; Bachelor's degree the cost engineering specialist(s) must be certified by a professional organization, such as the Association for the Advancement of Cost Engineering (AACE), International Costs Engineering Council (ICEC), and Professional Construction Estimators Association (PCEA). The firm's and/or consultant's cost engineering or estimating specialist(s), must be specifically identified and his (their) competence indicated by resume(s) (12) Geotechnical Engineer; 4 (13) Corrosion Engineer Registered National Association of Corrosion Engineers (NACE) Certified Corrosion Specialist NACE Certified Cathodic Protection Specialist (CP4), or registered professional corrosion engineer with a minimum of five (5) years' experience; (14) Security/Cyber Security Specialist; the security/cyber security specialist(s) must have minimum of five (5) years of experience in cybersecurity of facility related control systems; (15) Landscape Architect who is a registered professional landscape architect; (16) Interior Designer who is a registered architect with specialized experience in interior design and/or State registered interior designer and/or National Council for Interior Design Qualification (NCIDQ) certified interior designer; (17) Geologist; Geology or physical scientist Bachelor's degree, with 5 years' experience and a Certified Professional Geologist (CPG) form the American Institute of Professional Geologists (AIPG). If an individual will serve in more than one discipline then those disciplines shall be indicated in Block 13, PART I, Section E. Resumes (Section E of the SF 330) must be provided for all disciplines, including consultants. In the resumes under Project Assignments, use the same discipline nomenclature as is used in this announcement. The Government may provide additional consideration to offerors where key personnel worked on relevant projects that demonstrates experience relevant to Criteria B. Criteria B - Specialized Experience and Technical Competence in the type of work required, inc luding, as appropriate, experience in sustainable design, energy conservation, poll ution prevention, waste reduction, and the use of recovered materials (SF330, Part I, Section F): The offeror shall provide a maximum of ten (10) projects in total within the past six (6) years preceding the date of this announcement for both, the prime firm and subcontractor(s) in PART I, Section F, of the SF330. Examples of projects shall not exceed two (2) pages each. If any portion of the work provided as specialized experience is subcontracted, clearly identify that work as such and provide the required experience of that subcontractor as it relates to work the subcontractor is to perform for this solicitation. If the offeror is a joint venture, each firm shall provide information demonstrating experience relevant to their role on this project. Joint Venture Requirements - Parties wishing to propose as a joint venture must submit, with the Pro Forma documents, an executed copy of the joint venture agreement. The joint venture agreement shall be executed in accordance with FAR 4.102(d). Each joint venture partner shall submit evidence satisfactory to the Contracting Officer that its 5 Board of Directors has approved its participation in the joint venture or by an instrument of similarly binding character in the case of an unincorporated entity. Offerors are reminded that to obtain an award the awardee, to include a joint venture, must be registered in the System for Award Management (SAM) database. Applicable to set aside solicitations: Joint Ventures must meet applicable size standards (See FAR Subpart 19.1). Submit with the proposal any size determination for the Joint Venture entity received from the Small Business Administration. A Joint Venture where-in one party is not a small business may be referred to the Small Business Administration (IAW FAR 19.302 (b)) to determine eligibility. All questions regarding Joint Ventures must be directed to the Small Business Administration (SBA) and not the Contracting Officer. A Project is defined as a single, stand-alone contract and/or a single task order issued under an existing IDIQ contract(s) unless the project included multiple phases and was issued under more than one contractual order. It shall be noted that an IDIQ contract is not a project. Do not combine multiple task orders unrelated to a stand-alone project to create a single project example. Combining multiple task orders under an IDIQ to create a single project will not be compliant with the solicitation criteria, and it will not be evaluated or considered. The contract number or IDIQ number and individual task order number associated with the project in the title must be included for each of the projects. If the project is not 100% complete, note the currenINDEFINITE DELIVERY TYPE ARCHITECT ENGINEER (A-E) CONTRACT FOR THE MINNESOTA NATIONAL GUARD IN SUPPORT OF THE AIR NATIONAL GUARD, 133rd AIRLIFT WING, ST. PAUL MINNESOTA.\ CONTRACT INFORMATION: The Minnesota National Guard is soliciting for Non-Personal Architect-Engineer (A-E) Services per Public Law 92-582 (Selection of A-E Statute) and Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) Part 36. One contract will be solicited unrestricted for a five-year ordering period. The North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) code for this action 541330. The Small Business size standard is $16.5M. Small businesses are encouraged to team with other businesses. The A-E firm must be capable of responding to and working on multiple task orders concurrently. As a result of this announcement, the Minnesota National Guard intends to award one (1) Indefinite Delivery Indefinite Quantity IDIQ A-E contract award solicited as Other than Small Business (i.e. unrestricted). This contract will provide A-E services in support of the 133rd Airlift Wing, St. Paul, Minnesota Air National Guard (ANG). This is not a requirements contract. See attachment for complete details. 8.17.22: Amendment #01 added along with RFI Tracker *Visit 'https://piee.eb.mil/sol/xhtml/unauth/search/oppMgmtLink.xhtmlsolNo=W912LM22R0003' to obtain more details.* 8.17.22: Amendment #01 added along with RFI Trackert percentage and estimated date when the project will be completed for each contract and/or task order. Firms shall only submit projects as evidence of experience if those projects are at a minimum beyond B1/65% design submission for Type A/B experience, and at a minimum 50% complete on construction for Type C experience. Include the percentage of work self-performed by the prime for each contract and/or task order. If proposing as a JV, ascribe the percentage of work self-performed by each Joint Venture member. The offeror and/or subcontractors must demonstrate experience in the following areas with narrative and by average revenue in part II where indicated: (1) Experience in the design of military projects (Profile Code M05 in Part II), including the production of programming documents, plans and specifications; (2) Design of government and commercial facilities; (3) Specialized Expertise demonstrating a broad base of knowledge integrating federal requirements to include: Sustainable design experience (Profile Code S11 in Part II) per UFC 1G200G02, High Performance and Sustainable Building Requirements and certified LEED AP; Technical Competence & Experience using DOD UFC and associated Unified Facilities Guide Specifications (UFGS); Design and construction experience conforming to Department of Defense Antiterrorism/Force Protection Construction Standards and DOD Unified Facilities Criteria (UFC 4G010G01), note that the Government may provide additional consideration for engineers and architects who have attended any DoD Security Engineer Course; Performance of surveying and mapping (Profile Code S10 in Part II) following A/E/C CADD Standards and nondestructive techniques for locating underground utilities; and experience with REVIT (cloud), Civil-3D or other building modeling technologies or virtual reality and UFC 3- 101-01; Source Selection Information, See FAR 2.101 and Part 3.104 6 (4) Experience providing Comprehensive Interior Design for government projects including space planning and applicable Code of Federal Regulation rules, preGwired workstations, furniture, demountable wall systems, and knowledge of the acquisition process including applicable FAR and funding limitations; (5) Demonstrate experience and familiarity with Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) Part 77 and preparing FAA 7460 permit applications relating to construction projects and familiarity with UFC 3-260-01; (6) Demonstrate experience using project and construction management tools such as Newforma, Primavera, Submittal Exchange, ProjectWise, iPDWeb, or similar systems; (7) Demonstrate experience (Profile Code C15 and T02 in Part II) in evaluating contractor's submittals, request for change, request for information, and performing construction surveillance; (8) Demonstrate the ability to prepare supporting comprehensive master planning maps and plans using the latest versions of ESRI and ArcGIS; (9) Demonstrate experience (Profile Codes A10, E13 in Part II) in design and survey for abatement of asbestos, leadGbased paint, and the handling/disposal of other toxic and regulated substances; (10) Demonstrate experience (Profile Code E09 in Part II) with NEPA's process and Requirements. As well as preparation of required documentation; (11) In Section H of the SF 330, describe the firm's quality management plan, including quality assurance process, coordination of inGhouse work, coordination with consultants, and prior experience of the prime firm and significant consultants or partner firms. For each project identified under Criteria B, demonstrate project designGtoGbid performance showing final design estimate, initial awarded bid amount, and the calculated variance comparing the costs. When the variance is 5% or greater (positive or negative), the firm shall provide a written explanation for that variance; Criteria C G Capacity to accomplish multiple task orders in the required time (SF330, Part I, Section H). Firms must have the capacity to proceed with work and accomplish it promptly once a notice to proceed is issued and accomplish it prior to scheduled completion dates, including emergency response. Firms must demonstrate the ability to accomplish multiple task orders simultaneously. The evaluation will consider the prime availability of an adequate number of key personnel, equipment, and the extent of in-house facilities versus subcontracting needs. The A-E should submit evidence in the SF330 Part I, Section H, to support its capacity to accomplish work based on the following criteria: (1) Ability to meet design schedules and accomplish the work within the required time; (2) Ability to accomplish multiple task orders simultaneously: demonstrate the ability to accomplish multiple task orders (roughly equivalent to 4-6 task orders per year) above $100K in design costs that involve multiple concurrent disciplines, complex designs, and unique design solutions; 7 (3) Demonstrate the project team proposed has the ability to manage and complete the anticipated workload as a result of a contract award from this announcement considering existing work the firm already has with other Government or private entities. Criteria D -Past Performance (SF330, Part I, Section H): Firm must provide relevant past performance in the accomplishment of similar work. Firm must submit information for relevant contracts and subcontracts including the name, address, and telephone number of references. Relevancy is defined in the DOD guide to collection and use of past performance as information that has a logical connection with the matter under consideration and application time span. Submit information for all relevant contracts and subcontracts started or completed within the past six (6) years measured from the date of award. Firms may include supporting information in the proposal, such as letters of commendation from clients, on past performance on recent similar contracts include information on problems encountered in prior contracts and discuss actions taken to remedy unsatisfactory performance. Past performance on contracts with Government agencies and private industry regarding quality, cost control and timeliness of work will be reviewed. Past DOD experience data available to the Government through Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS) will also be evaluated. Other credible, documented information on past performance should be considered, except for adverse performance information to which the firm has not had an opportunity to respond. Criteria E - Knowledge of the locality of the project areas (1) Knowledge of locality of the project areas within the state of Minnesota. Firm should have knowledge of the general geographical area of Hennepin county, MN which encompasses the predominant location of the 133rd Airlift Wing, Air National Guard Base located in St. Paul as well as other areas throughout the State of Minnesota along with recent experience of state laws. (2) Submit information addressing specific knowledge of hydrology, soil conditions, seismic conditions, weather conditions, and knowledge of State and local building codes and practices. (3) Describe the extent of your familiarity with the defined local area construction industry expertise and its standard practices. Criteria F - Secondary Criteria THE FOLLOWING SECONDARY CRITERIA WILL BE USED AS A TIE BREAKER, IF NECESSARY: The firm shall provide all data for these secondary criteria on Part I, Section H, of the SF330. 8 1. Volume of Past DOD Contracts awarded to the firm during the previous 12 months: Offerors shall provide the volume of work awarded by DOD agencies during the previous 12 months. The volume of work shall be demonstrated in a table format and be categorized by contract, task order, project award, completion dates, and design fee dollar amount. Work previously awarded to the firm by DOD will be reviewed to effect an equitable distribution of contracts among equally qualified firms. Data from the Federal Procurement Data System (FPDS) may be also utilized by the Government. 2. Superior Performance Evaluations on recently completed DoD contracts. Performance with ratings of exceptional will be considered as Superior Performance Evaluations. 3. The extent to which potential contractors identify and commit to small business and to small disadvantaged business (SDB) where the NAICS Industry Subsector of the subcontracted effort is one in which use of an evaluation factor or subfactor for participation of SDB concerns is authorized (see FAR 19.201(b)), and to historically black college or university and minority institution performance as subcontractors. The extent of commitment shall comply with the requirements of FAR 52.219-8. Offerors demonstrating a greater commitment to small business participation will be evaluated more favorably under this criterion. 4. Geographic Proximity within the locations of the state. 9 CRITERIA RATINGS: Technical criteria described above (A, B, C, E, and F) will be assigned one of the following adjectival ratings: BLUE (Outstanding) - SF 330 Proposal meets requirements and indicates an exceptional approach and understanding of the requirements and contains multiple strengths, and the risk of unsuccessful performance is low. PURPLE (Good) - SF 330 Proposal indicates a thorough approach and understanding of the requirements and contains at least one strength, and the risk of unsuccessful performance is low to moderate. GREEN (Acceptable) - SF 330 Proposal meets requirements and indicates an adequate approach and understanding of the requirements, and the risk of unsuccessful performance is no worse than moderate. YELLOW (Marginal) - SF 330 Proposal has not demonstrated an adequate approach and understanding of the requirements and/or risk of unsuccessful performance is high. RED (Unacceptable) - SF 330 Proposal does not meet the requirements of the synopsis advertised on Contracting Opportunities, and thus contains one or more unacceptable deficiencies, and/or risk of unsuccessful performance. The proposal is non-awardable. The following adjectival relevance and performance confidence ratings will be used to evaluate the Past Performance criteria (D): Relevance Ratings: Very Relevant - Present/past performance effort involved essentially the same scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires. Relevant - Present/past performance effort involved similar scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires. Somewhat Relevant - Present/past performance effort involved some of the scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires. Not Relevant - Present/past performance effort involved little or none of the scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires. 10 Performance Confidence Ratings: Substantial Confidence - Based on the offeror's recent/relevant performance record, the Government has a high expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort. Satisfactory Confidence - Based on the offeror's recent/relevant performance record, the Government has a reasonable expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort. Neutral - No recent/relevant performance record is available or the offeror's performance record is so sparse that no meaningful confidence assessment rating can be reasonably assigned. The offeror may not be evaluated favorably or unfavorably on the factor of past performance. Limited Confidence - Based on the offeror's recent/relevant performance record, the Government has a low expectation that the offeror will be able to successfully perform the required effort. No Confidence - Based on the offeror's recent/relevant performance record, the Government does not expect that the offeror will be able to successfully perform the required effort. ENFORCEABILITY OF PROPOSAL: The proposal must set forth full, accurate, and complete information as required by this announcement. By submission of the offer, the Offeror agrees that all items proposed (if applicable e.g., key personnel, subcontractors, etc.) will be utilized for the duration of the contract and any substitutions shall require prior Contracting Officer's approval. The award decision for this contract will be based, in part, on an evaluation of the key personnel and/or subcontractors the Contractor included in its proposal for the positions and/or items of subcontracted work identified in the proposal. The Contractor agrees these key personnel and/or subcontractors will be employed as described in its proposal and no substitutes will be employed without the prior written approval of the Contracting Officer or Administrative Contracting Officer. The Contractor further agrees that any proposed substitutes shall meet or exceed the qualifications of the original personnel and/or subcontractors. If the Contractor's proposal did not name a subcontractor for an identified item of work, the Contractor will not be allowed to subcontract that item of work without prior approval of the Contracting Officer or Administrative Contracting Officer. ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS: Indicate in Section C.11 if the prime has worked with the team members in the past six years. In Block G-26, along with the name, include the firm with which the person is associated. Part II is required for each branch office of the Prime Firm and any Subcontractors that will have a key role in the proposed contract. A firm will not be 11 considered if it's SF330 Part I is not signed, unless the SF330 Part I is accompanied by a signed cover letter or a current (within 3 years) signed SF330 Part II. If a firm does not submit an SF330 Part II with its SF330 Part I, or have one on file, it will not be considered (FAR 36.603(b)). This is not a request for a price proposal. As required by acquisition regulations, interviews to discuss prospective contractors' qualifications for the contracts will be conducted only for those firms considered most highly qualified after submittal review by the selection board. Interviews may be inperson and will be scheduled after the final selection board has determined the most highly qualified firms. Because we do not know the number of offers that will need to be reviewed, the timeframe for scheduling is uncertain but is anticipated to be at least 45 days from the close of the submittal package due date. Small Business Firms submitting a proposal under the Small Business category are required to meet the requirements of 52.219-14, Limitations on Subcontracting (Deviation 2021-O0008) (e) (1), which states "By submission of an offer and execution of a contract, the Contractor agrees that in performance of a contract assigned a North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) code for, (1) Services (except construction), it will not pay more than 50 percent of the amount paid by the Government for contract performance, excluding certain other direct costs and certain work performed outside the United States (see paragraph (e)(1)(i)), to subcontractors that are not similarly situated entities. Any work that a similarly situated entity further subcontracts will count towards the prime contractor's 50 percent subcontract amount that cannot be exceeded. When a contract includes both services and supplies, the 50 percent limitation shall apply only to the service portion of the contract." All Small Business Firms submitting a proposal under the Small Business category shall provide evidence of meeting this requirement in SF330 Section H. For all subcontractors, please provide name, CAGE Code, work to be performed by the subcontractor, small business category, and percentage of work to be subcontracted. AMENDMENTS: Any change made will be in the form of an amendment to the notice, and will be furnished to all prospective offerors via posting to https://SAM.gov. (See Note 2) Amendments will be posted in the form of a pdf document which will show edits in the form of tracked changes. Additions will be underlined and deletions will be strikethrough. ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF AMENDMENTS: Offerors MUST acknowledge all amendments issued to this notice in order to be considered. Acknowledgement of ALL amendments can be provided in a cover letter when submitting the proposal. RESPONSES TO QUESTIONS: Answers that clarify or provide an interpretation to the notice will not be posted via amendment but rather as a response to the question on SAM.gov (See Note 2). Responses to questions will be posted as attachments to the notice. 12 In the unlikely event the PIEE system is not operational, experiences technical difficulties, or a Contractor is temporarily unable to access or use the system, the Contractor shall immediately notify the Contracting Officer, 2d Lt. Christopher Fisher at christopher.fisher.7@us.af.mil and Contract Specialist, Tracy White at tracy.l.white7.mil@army.mil. This Notification must occur prior to the task order proposal submission deadline. Contractor notification shall be in writing and may be in conjunction with verbal notification, but verbal notification alone shall not be sufficient. In the event the Contractor alleges technical difficulties and does not notify the contracting officer until after the closing date and time, the contracting officer will follow the procedures identified IAW FAR 15.208. The regulation requires that the Selection Board not consider any submittals received after this time and date. Late proposal rules for receipt of the SF330s IAW FAR 15.208 will be followed for packages received after Time on the closing date specified in this announcement. To be eligible for contract award, a firm must be registered with the System for Award Management (SAM) database. For instructions on registering with SAM, please see the SAM website at https://SAM.gov/portal/public/SAM. SF330, in Adobe format and the most current edition (https://www.gsa.gov/formslibrary/architect-engineer-qualifications), must be used, and may be obtained from the General Services Administration at the following web site: http://www.gsa.gov/portal/forms/download/116486. Include Unique Entity Identifier number in Block 5 of the SF330 PART I, Section B. To obtain a Unique Entity ID and register your entity to do business with the U.S. government go to SAM.gov. All fonts shall be at least 10 pitch or larger. Pages shall be 8-1/2 inches by 11 inches. PART I OF THE SF 330 SHALL NOT EXCEED 75 PAGES. The Organization Chart required in Section D and the Matrix required as Section G, Blank pages separating the sections within the SF330 will not count in the pagecount maximum for PART I. Sequentially number all pages of the final product submitted. SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS: Interested Architect-Engineer firms having the capabilities to perform this work are invited to submit an electronic copy of their SF330 (Architect-Engineer Qualifications) in Adobe format through the Solicitation Portal on Procurement Integrated Enterprise Environment (PIEE) at https://piee.eb.mil/ Solicitation packages shall not be provided. SF330s must be received no later than 2:00 PM Central Time on 29 August 2022. 13 QUESTIONS: All questions shall be in writing as outlined below. Phone calls and personal visits to discuss this solicitation with the contracting and or engineering personnel are not allowed. SUBMIT QUESTIONS ONLY TO: Contract Specialist, Tracy White at tracy.l.white7.mil@army.mil and Contracting Officer, 2d Lt. Christopher Fisher at christopher.fisher.7@us.af.mil No phone questions will be honored. Questions will be answered in writing and posted to a Questions and Answer document and posted to https://piee.eb.mil/. Contractors are encouraged to view the Q&A document BEFORE sending in a question as it may already be answered. NOTE 1: All questions are to be submitted no later than 5 business days prior to the due date for proposals. The method of contractor selection has not been determined at this time. |
||||||||||
Details |
|
||||||||||
Bidder's List | View project details and contacts | ||||||||||
Prospective Bidders | View project details and contacts | ||||||||||
Project Documents |
Engineered Spec Sheet Architectural Plans Other Documents |