Similar Projects
Supplemental Architect/Engineer Services for Southeast Texas
Results
Less than $10,000,000 est. value

Supplemental Architect/Engineer Services for Southeast Texas
Results
Less than $10,000,000 est. value

Last Updated 11/18/2020 10:22 AM
Project Title

Single Award IQC - Plains Area (South)

Physical Address View project details and contacts
City, State (County) State-Wide: NM, TX
Category(s) Professional Services
Sub-Category(s) Architectural, Engineering
Contracting Method Competitive Bids.
Project Status Results
Bids Due View project details and contacts
Estimated Value $1,000 to $3,750,000
Plans Available from Federal Agency
Owner View project details and contacts
Architect View project details and contacts
Description

Services under the contracts will include, but are not limited to, energy-related studies, environmental site assessments and studies, building and/or site investigations/studies, feasibility and conceptual studies, geotechnical investigations, radon testing, asbestos and other hazardous materials abatement, life cycle cost analyses, engineering design criteria development, statements of work/program of requirements development, design analyses, designs, construction drawings, specifications (including specifications for design-build), detailed cost estimates and analyses, bidding phase services, construction management/administration (including on-site construction management/administration, bid evaluations, shop drawings and submittals review and approval), construction inspection and/or monitoring, design review, technical consultation, field surveys, engineering reports, and computer-aided drafting. Consideration of firms will be limited to those firms who can provide professional A-E services primarily in the disciplines of architectural, civil, structural, mechanical, electrical and environmental engineering for pre-design, design and post-design A-E services for research laboratory facilities, including greenhouses and specialized farm buildings such as breeding and rearing facilities, barns, stock-watering systems/facilities, etc. The following specific factors will form the basis for evaluation and determination of those highly qualified firms and selection of the best qualified. All factors are weighted by importance, individual factor weights are listed with each factor description: 1. Specialized experience and technical competence in the type of work required to alter or repair facilities in support of agricultural research in laboratory and field settings, including, where appropriate, pollution prevention, waste reduction, and the use of recovered materials. Experience in the inclusion of energy-saving and sustainable features into the design, as shown using the requirements of ASHRAE 90.1, EPACT 2005, Executive Order No. 13693 and LEED. Various tasks include: Mechanical, Electrical, Structural, Civil, Retro-Commissioning, and Construction Management Services. Preference will be given to firms who demonstrate experience with agricultural research facilities. 2. The capacity of the Design A-E and its consultants, in terms of numbers and diversity of in-house disciplines and resources, to accomplish all work on schedule and to successfully manage multiple task orders simultaneously. 3. Professional qualifications; including general education, training and experience of the Design A-E and its primary consultants necessary for satisfactory performance of required services. Professional Licenses of Firms and Team Members in all the states included in the Area of interest. 4. Past performance on similar contracts with Government agencies and private industry in terms of cost control, quality control, compliance with performance schedules, and demonstrated ability to successfully coordinate all planning, design, bid and construction phase work with all subcontractors, and to communicate effectively with the customer on project progress issues. Demonstrated ability in: quality assurance work, "punch lists," commissioning services, final inspections; and Record Drawings is vital. 5. Location of a major offices within geographic proximity to ARS Area Headquarters; Co-location of the offices of the consultants in the same general location as the Design A-E is preferred. Firms shall submit their procedures for coordinating project activities with consultants and sub-consultants which are not co-located within the same general location of the firm.

Details

Bidder's List View project details and contacts
Prospective Bidders View project details and contacts
Project Documents
 Engineered Spec Sheet
 Architectural Plans
 Other Documents